Editing AIDAVA Documents (section)

== Key Insights from Documents ==

'''What works:'''
* Usability of the system is good (computer and phone)
* Patients are interested in maintaining their health records
* 45% automation rate is a solid baseline for a first prototype

'''What needs improvement:'''
* Explanation system (why should I do this?)
* Curation time (20 min/document is too slow)
* Clearer benefits for patients (especially in countries with existing central portals)
* Question formulation in the system

'''For competitive analysis:'''
* The project is struggling with patient engagement and perceived value
* 45% automation means 55% still requires manual work
* 20 min/document is a significant bottleneck
* Countries with existing health data portals (like Estonia) show less patient interest
* G2 will add more AI but won't be tested until early 2026